The Japanese prefer to settle disagreements privately and avoid public embarrassment. This essay will provide a brief history of this evolution and evaluation of some advantages and disadvantages of a modern jury system.
Another example would be Sander v United Kingdom one juror had written a letter to the judge explaining that some of the other jurors had been making racist remarks. Inconsistencies throughout the country.
Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by random selection. A further advantage of jury equity is not having to give a reason for the verdict that they have reached.
Cannot follow complicated tax or fraud cases.
One would be trial by a single judge, this method is mainly used in civil court cases it is also known for being a fairer, more predictable result. Are jury trials fair and is it time to scrap them?
Majority verdicts can convict when there is doubt which should have been given to the defendant.Evaluate the accuracy of this statement with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, the alternatives available and any reforms that have been introduced or recommended. Perverse jury verdicts can provide a "criminal equity". I will also evaluate the jury system. Juries do understand the burden of proof, and lower it in paedophile cases and child murders. It seems that trial by jury will still continue for many years and will remain to be an asset to society. However, a cap placed on medical malpractice cases and other cases that are of negligence would standardize the monetary compensation regardless of the damage. Whats the best option to render your trial verdict—a jury or a judge?