Criteria for evaluating both product and process can be communicated by giving students a group work rubric pdf before they begin their work and then using it to provide meaningful feedback during and at the end of the project.
No namedropping. OR the conclusion did not show how the supporting information proved the thesis.
Typos show weak editing. Fair The thesis statement did not present a direction for the paper or the conclusion did not use the supporting information to prove an idea in the paper. Did not follow directions completely.
Conclusion satisfies. Once peer-editing is complete, have students hand in their essay's. This strategy gives diligent students a greater sense of fairness and control and discourages free ridership. The Eberly Center can help you find, adapt, or create the right tool and determine how to use it to best effect.